Not known Facts About h4831sc

This is certainly supposed to be the "visit" powder-or darn near it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It really is the inspiration for a great number of pet loads, but I have not been pleased with the final results.

Of course, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different lot numbers, but I feel I understand why. It's a litigation-driven entire world, and many fool would absolutely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his have personalized blend of powder. What a planet.

It can be possible that no further discussion is needed, wherein situation we advise starting off a brand new thread. If on the other hand you are feeling your reaction is needed you are able to still do so.

Warning utilizing SC or SSC designed loads with very long Minimize, back off and work up. Use Safe and sound loading methods.

Novice to reloading. This will probably be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been capable of get my palms on a few kilos of h4831.

I do know, rough instances. H4831SC will certainly work, I just didn't like the case density when loaded prolonged. I do not bear in mind powder charge off the best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that's where by I commonly purpose being. Within your scenario employing what you may have (and what I should have performed) I would start with the top h4831 vs h4831sc in the bearing floor of your bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you find a velocity node.

I'm utilizing it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as exact. RL22 did perfectly but I had been slightly worried about temp stability. I feel I'm at 72 grains and get about 2850ish fps

The SC or SSC selected powders Ordinarily let for better load density, so you can commonly get a bit more powder inside of a provided circumstance when making use of compressed loads. Utilization of a fall tube can further more maximize this edge.

WA I might endorse a slower burner which will give greater circumstance density like H1000 or IMR 7977, especially if you are loading heavies very long.

Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or limited cut. The shorter, additional compact kernels allow the powder to circulation through the powder actions more smoothly, helping to ease the continual chopping of granules.

I have had identical encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders is not going h4831 vs h4831sc to shoot properly with just about anything besides Fed215's. Some factors just don't Enjoy nicely with other. Looks like you've selected three great powders, I might hope at the least one of these to shoot.

I take advantage of 52 grs H4831sc using a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It really is correct, gentle mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it had been me, I'd begin at 52 gr and function up.

I'm sure the H4831SC offers a much better load density But I think I've sufficient home in my situation for the traditional H4831.

The reality that the H4831 h4831 vs h4831sc is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you happen to be seeing larger velocities attained with that powder, instead of That which you've seen Together with the IMR things.